Formula over facts? Rethinking public health priorities in budget allocations

As budget negotiations unfold across the region, concerns mount over reported facilitation and policy incentives extended to formula milk marketers—raising red flags about how corporate interests can overshadow public health. In light of this, a February 2022 report by Social Track (Karachi), drawing on a major WHO study, remains strikingly relevant today. It offers a sobering reminder of how deeply formula milk marketing penetrates health systems, influences feeding choices, and undermines breastfeeding culture globally.

With formula sales surging and breastfeeding stagnating, it’s time to revisit that report and ask: are current budget decisions aligned with the best interests of mothers and children?

                    -------------------------------------

WHO report warns against formula milk marketing strategies

KARACHI: A lately released international report by WHO says that over a half of the parents and pregnant women surveyed in eight countries were exposed to various formula milk marketing strategies and procedures implemented reportedly in breach of international standards, compromising child nutrition.

The report, “How marketing of formula milk influences our decisions on infant feeding”, has been drawn on interviews with parents, pregnant women and health workers in cities across Bangladesh, China, Mexico, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa, the United Kingdom and Vietnam. This cross-regional research was commissioned by WHO in seven countries and Unicef in China only.

“The report finds that industry marketing techniques include unregulated and invasive online targeting; sponsored advice networks and helplines; promotions and free gifts; and practices to influence training and recommendations among health workers. The messages that parents and health workers receive are often misleading, scientifically unsubstantiated, and violate the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes (the Code) – a landmark public health agreement passed by the World Health Assembly in 1981 to protect mothers from aggressive marketing practices by the baby food industry,” said a WHO communication from Geneva/New York.

IV photos

Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, said, “Regulations on exploitative marketing must be urgently adopted and enforced to protect children’s health.”

Unicef Executive Director Catherine Russell said: “False and misleading messages about formula feeding are a substantial barrier to breastfeeding, which we know is best for babies and mothers.” She called for robust policies, legislation and investment in breastfeeding to ensure that women are protected from unethical marketing practices.

According to the report, exposure to formula milk marketing reaches 84 per cent of all women surveyed in the United Kingdom; 92 per cent of women surveyed in Vietnam and 97 per cent of women surveyed in China, increasing their likelihood of choosing formula feeding.

The WHO communication emphasised that breastfeeding within the first hour of birth, followed by exclusive breastfeeding for six months and continued breastfeeding for up to two years or beyond, offers a powerful line of defence against all forms of child malnutrition, including wasting and obesity.

“Breastfeeding also acts as babies’ first vaccine, protecting them against many common childhood illnesses. It also reduces women’s future risk of diabetes, obesity and some forms of cancer. Yet globally, only 44 per cent of babies less than 6 months old are exclusively breastfed. Global breastfeeding rates have increased very little in the past two decades, while sales of formula milk have more than doubled in roughly the same time.”

According to the research report, across all countries included in the survey, women expressed a strong desire to breastfeed exclusively, ranging from 49 per cent of women in Morocco to 98 per cent in Bangladesh.

The report details how a sustained flow of misleading marketing messages is reinforcing myths about breastfeeding and breast-milk, and undermining women’s confidence in their ability to breastfeed successfully. “These myths include the necessity of formula in the first days after birth, the inadequacy of breast-milk for infant nutrition, that specific infant formula ingredients are proven to improve child development or immunity, the perception that formula keeps infants fuller for longer, and that the quality of breast-milk declines with time.”

In addition, the report notes that large number of health workers in all countries had been approached by the baby feeding industry to influence their recommendations to new mothers through promotional gifts, free samples, funding for research, paid meetings, conferences and even commissions from sales, directly impacting on parents’ feeding choices. “More than one third of women surveyed said a health worker had recommended a specific brand of formula to them.”

A comprehensive analysis was conducted in each country to assess the volume and dynamics of formula milk marketing and to map various types of advertisements, messengers, contents and forms of dissemination, said the WHO press release.

Originally published by News Desk, Social Track, Karachi – 25.2.2022 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

KU syndicate takes decisions on appointments, terminations

KU syndicate greenlights SHEC building on campus, despite reservations

University of Karachi syndicate meeting mired in controversy